Redefining Sin - Two Ways to Find Happiness
Jesus portrays the two basic ways people try to find happiness and fulfillment in life: the younger brother's method of self discovery, and the elder brother's way of moral conformity.
In ancient patriarchal cultures few tried self discovery, but today it is common. Individuals must be free to purse their own goals and self-actualization regardless of custom and convention. "I'm the only one who can decide what is right or wrong for me, not tradition."
In the second view, we attain happiness and a world made right by achieving moral rectitude. We fall at times, of course, but we are judge by how object and intense our regret is. In this way, even in our failures we should measure up. "The immoral people who do their own thing are the problem with the world, and moral people are the solution."
America is divided by these two paths, with each saying "Our way is the way the world will be put to rights, and if you are not with us, you are against us." A few combine these approaches and as self-righteous of their independent lifestyle as the worst Pharisee, and others are Pharisees living a secret life of rebellion as a release.
While it seems the parable has a good son and a bad, the father has to invite each of his sons into the feast: there is not one lost son, but two. The elder brother is not withdrawing from the father's love, because of his 'goodness'. It's not his sins that create a barrier, but his moral record. The hearts of the two brother's were the same, both wanted the father for his money. The elder's unspoken demand: "I have never disobeyed you! Now you have to do things in my life the way I want them to be done."
Religious people often obey God to get things, which is just as wrong as disregarding God to get what you want. Jesus left the elder's brother's plight unresolved, perhaps to show his listeners that since his rebellion was less obvious, it was all the more dangerous. The majority of those listening were probably elder brothers, and He gave them a chance to finish the story in their own life. Would they accept Jesus's radical alternative for the third path to enter into a relationship with the Father, for it's own benefit?
Jesus portrays the two basic ways people try to find happiness and fulfillment in life: the younger brother's method of self discovery, and the elder brother's way of moral conformity.
In ancient patriarchal cultures few tried self discovery, but today it is common. Individuals must be free to purse their own goals and self-actualization regardless of custom and convention. "I'm the only one who can decide what is right or wrong for me, not tradition."
In the second view, we attain happiness and a world made right by achieving moral rectitude. We fall at times, of course, but we are judge by how object and intense our regret is. In this way, even in our failures we should measure up. "The immoral people who do their own thing are the problem with the world, and moral people are the solution."
America is divided by these two paths, with each saying "Our way is the way the world will be put to rights, and if you are not with us, you are against us." A few combine these approaches and as self-righteous of their independent lifestyle as the worst Pharisee, and others are Pharisees living a secret life of rebellion as a release.
While it seems the parable has a good son and a bad, the father has to invite each of his sons into the feast: there is not one lost son, but two. The elder brother is not withdrawing from the father's love, because of his 'goodness'. It's not his sins that create a barrier, but his moral record. The hearts of the two brother's were the same, both wanted the father for his money. The elder's unspoken demand: "I have never disobeyed you! Now you have to do things in my life the way I want them to be done."
Religious people often obey God to get things, which is just as wrong as disregarding God to get what you want. Jesus left the elder's brother's plight unresolved, perhaps to show his listeners that since his rebellion was less obvious, it was all the more dangerous. The majority of those listening were probably elder brothers, and He gave them a chance to finish the story in their own life. Would they accept Jesus's radical alternative for the third path to enter into a relationship with the Father, for it's own benefit?